When you signed a merchant cash advance agreement, the funder almost certainly required you to sign a personal guaranty. Now the business is struggling or closed, and the funder is coming after your personal assets — your home, your bank accounts, everything. But the personal guaranty may not mean what the funder claims it means.

Most MCA personal guarantees are limited in scope, and there are powerful legal defenses that can reduce or eliminate your personal exposure.

What an MCA Personal Guaranty Actually Covers

Read the language carefully. Most MCA personal guarantees do not guarantee the full "purchased amount." Instead, they guarantee specific, limited obligations:

Typical Guaranty Coverage

What the Guaranty Does NOT Cover

This is a critical distinction. Many MCA funders demand the full "balance owed" from the guarantor after a business closes. But if the contract says business closure is not a breach, and the guaranty only covers specific performance obligations, the guarantor's exposure may be minimal or zero.

The Business Closure Defense

This is the strongest defense for personal guarantors. If your business is closed:

  1. No future receivables: The business generates no revenue, so there are no receivables for the funder to purchase
  2. No breach: The MCA contract itself states that "going out of business does not constitute a breach"
  3. No acceleration: If there is no breach, the funder cannot accelerate the balance or demand the full purchased amount
  4. No guarantor liability: If the underlying obligation is zero (no receivables to purchase), the guaranty covers nothing

A personal guaranty is only as strong as the underlying obligation. If the MCA contract expressly says business failure is the funder's risk, the guarantor cannot be held liable for a risk the funder agreed to bear.

When the Funder Overreaches

If the funder is pursuing you personally for the full purchased amount, they are implicitly treating the MCA as a loan. This creates a fatal legal problem for them:

The Loan Recharacterization Trap

By demanding personal payment of the full balance regardless of business receivables, the funder is conceding that the contract is actually a loan — not a sale of future receivables. And if it is a loan:

The funder cannot have it both ways. They cannot claim "it's a sale, not a loan" to avoid usury laws while simultaneously demanding full repayment from the guarantor like a loan.

Defending Against Guaranty Collection

Step 1: Review the Guaranty Language

Read every word. Identify exactly what obligations you guaranteed. If the guaranty is limited to specific covenants rather than the full purchased amount, you have a strong defense.

Step 2: Assess Whether a Breach Occurred

Did you actually violate any covenant you guaranteed? If the business simply ran out of money and closed — which the contract says is not a breach — there may be no triggering event for guaranty liability.

Step 3: Raise Usury as a Personal Defense

If you are an individual (not a corporation), you can assert usury defenses in your personal capacity. In New York, the civil usury cap of 16% applies to individuals (the corporate exemption only protects the corporate borrower, not the individual guarantor in many cases).

Step 4: Challenge Jurisdiction

If the funder sues you personally in New York, challenge whether New York has personal jurisdiction over you as a Texas individual. Your only connection to New York may be signing a form — which may not be sufficient for jurisdiction, especially given HB 700's policy against out-of-state forum selection in commercial financing.

Step 5: Consider Personal Bankruptcy

If the MCA funder has obtained a judgment against you personally and is pursuing your assets:

Even the threat of personal bankruptcy can drive settlement, because MCA funders know that a discharged guarantee means they collect nothing from the guarantor.

Settlement Leverage as Guarantor

Personal guarantors have more leverage than they realize:

  1. The MCA funder wants money, not a judgment: They would rather settle for something than litigate for years and potentially lose on usury grounds
  2. Bankruptcy threat: If you file, the funder likely gets nothing from you personally
  3. Litigation cost: Pursuing a guarantor in Texas is expensive for a funder based in New York
  4. Multiple defenses: You can raise usury, limited guaranty scope, business closure, and due process simultaneously

Typical Settlement Structures

Protecting Your Personal Assets

While defending against the guaranty claim:

  1. Do not transfer assets: Moving assets to hide them from creditors can constitute fraudulent transfer, which creates additional liability
  2. Know your Texas exemptions: Texas protects your homestead (unlimited value), retirement accounts, and significant personal property from judgment creditors
  3. Separate personal and business finances: If you have not already, ensure your personal accounts are separate from business accounts being targeted
  4. Consult both a litigation attorney and a bankruptcy attorney: Understand all your options before making decisions

This article is part of the MCA Defense Guide. Call (469) 607-8552 for a free consultation.